Sketches

Sounds Familiar?

December 2, 2009 · 2 Comments

In a recent article, “Our God – Ratings,” the German weekly Die Zeit examined the policies of the two German nation-wide public broadcasters, the ARD and ZDF, both federations of Länder – organizations. In it the paper argues that they were on the way to abolishing themselves by copying the model of the private broadcasters.

Of the many points made, only those are listed here that are relevant to the Canadian situation.

  • The average German has his television set on for four hours a day. Every speech made by a politician who addresses matters related to culture and education should therefore deal with the problems facing public broadcasting. They rarely do.
  • “Difficult” subjects are avoided in favour of programs designed for viewers who prefer relaxing entertainments. Prime time is given only to wars that are not immediately threatening.
  • The history of ARD is a history of missed opportunities. It missed the chance to acquire the quiz program Who Will Become a Millionaire?, which has become a major success on the private RTL network.
  • Public broadcasters should use the current financial crisis, while the private competition is suffering from reduced advertising revenues, to show courage and take initiatives.
  • “Ratings are addictive,” producer O.B. states. Whenever one of his films is shown, he arranges to be woken up at three a.m. or whenever the ratings become available. If they are bad, he suffers for years.
  • The greatest threats are the politicians. They demand higher quality in public, but whenever a worthy program fails to attract big numbers they complain in the newspapers why public money should be wasted on second-rate shows. However, program directors are hypocritical if they tell you that they insist on high ratings because the politicians demand them.
  • The ZDF, with its 3,600 employees, is the largest television service on the continent and commissions more programs than any other broadcaster. No producer or writer dares to criticize it. Its directors have the power to change the ending of a play and to turn apples into bananas.
  • Producers and writers won’t criticize management in the studios. They shoot their darts only while under cover in nearby bars and taverns.
  • Difficult or depressing economic subjects are often flattened into questions of consumer protection.
  • In 1999 the ARD program Brennpunkt devoted 32 out of 72 programs to the war in Kosovo. Since the collapse of the Lehman Bank last September, Brennpunkt carried only one episode about the financial crisis. The program is about to dissolve into thin air.
  • Why don’t the politicians complain? Because they are more concerned with the question whether more guests from the CDU are invited than from the SPD.
  • A film-maker spends months and overcomes innumerable obstacles making a documentary about Bundeswehr units in Afghanistan. It is carried at eleven thirty p.m. and is seen only by insomniacs. Moving it to a better time would have required the consent of at least five Länder-broadcasters.
  • Still, one has to ask: does French, Italian or Spanish television offer more challenging fare? No. Leaving aside the BBC, one would have to work hard to find broadcasters in Europe who, in spite of these defects, offer more or better political magazines and documentaries than ARD and ZDF.

→ 2 CommentsCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,

Vigilance

December 1, 2009 · 2 Comments

Small countries living next door to giants, such as Finland and Canada, must be forever vigilant to maintain their independence.

This week Finland observes the seventieth anniversary of the outbreak of the Winter War when the Soviet Union invaded Finland. During the course of WWII, Finland changed allies twice.

The Finnish newspaper Karjalainen reflects on how external factors can decide the fate of smaller nations:

“Independence is always a power balance,” the paper says in an editorial. “Becoming independent means becoming independent from someone. Finland first became independent from Sweden, then from Russia. In the 1930s Finland was a young state capable of waging war, with deep prejudices against the economic system of its large neighbour. Finland felt threatened, and looked for help in all directions.

“But it is extremely difficult for a small country to take independent decisions. Finland’s history bears testimony to this. In the spring of 1940 Finland was ally to Britain and France against the Soviet Union and Germany for a short while. A year later it was fighting on the side of Germany against the Soviet Union and the Western Allies. In summer 1944 it was then on the side of the Soviet Union in the war against Germany. When the possibilities of a small country are limited, its leaders must adapt to the tide of history.”

How fortunate Canadians have been in comparison. All they have had to be vigilant against have been the sometimes embarrassingly passionate embraces of their friends, first the British, then the Americans.

Vigilant means, according to a Google dictionary, “ever alert, sleeplessly watchful.”

No wonder the Finns sleep so badly.

Up to a half a million Finns suffer from chronic sleep disorders. The population of Finland is 5,312.800.

A few days ago, the daily Kaleva analyzed the effect of sleeplessness on Finnish society: “Insomnia has a huge effect on people’s emotional and intellectual functioning, and significantly heightens the risk of cardiac and circulatory diseases. Studies show that sleeping problems also lead to higher rates of traffic problems than alcohol. The negative consequences of sleeplessness are so widespread that much more vigilance is required in the fight against them.” (Italics added.)

→ 2 CommentsCategories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , ,